Journal cover Journal topic
Wind Energy Science The interactive open-access journal of the European Academy of Wind Energy
Journal topic
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2018-8
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2018-8
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research articles 12 Feb 2018

Research articles | 12 Feb 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Wind Energy Science (WES). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

Wind farm power production assessment: a comparative analysis of two actuator disc methods and two analytical wake models

Nikolaos Simisiroglou1,2, Heracles Polatidis2, and Stefan Ivanell2 Nikolaos Simisiroglou et al.
  • 1WindSim AS, Fjordgaten 15, 3125 Tønsberg , Norway
  • 2Uppsala University, Wind Energy Section, Campus Gotland, 621 67 Visby, Sweden

Abstract. The aim of the present study is to perform a comparative analysis of two actuator disc methods (ACD) and two analytical wake models for wind farm power production assessment. To do so wind turbine power production data from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm in Sweden is used. The measured power production for individual wind turbines is compared with results from simulations, done in the WindSim software, using two ACD methods (old and new) and two analytical wake models widely used within the wind industry (Jensen and Larsen wake models). It was found that the new ACD method and the Larsen model outperform the other method and model in most cases. Furthermore, results from the new ACD method show a clear improvement in the estimated power production in comparison to the old ACD method. The Jensen method seems to overestimate the power deficit for all cases. The new ACD method, despite it's simplicity, is capable of capturing the power production within the given error margin although it tends to underestimate the power deficit.

Nikolaos Simisiroglou et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Nikolaos Simisiroglou et al.
Nikolaos Simisiroglou et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 393 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
270 109 14 393 7 15
  • HTML: 270
  • PDF: 109
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 393
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 15
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Feb 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 391 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 391 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 14 Dec 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The aim of the present study is to perform a comparative analysis of two actuator disc methods (ACD) and two analytical wake models for wind farm power production assessment. To do so wind turbine power production data from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm in Sweden is used. The measured power production for individual wind turbines is compared with results from simulations, done in the WindSim software.
The aim of the present study is to perform a comparative analysis of two actuator disc methods...
Citation
Share