Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2018-20
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research articles 04 Apr 2018

Research articles | 04 Apr 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript is under review for the journal Wind Energy Science (WES).

Microscale model comparison (benchmark) at the moderate complex forested site Ryningsnäs

Stefan Ivanell1, Johan Arnqvist1, Matias Avila2, Dalibor Cavar3, Roberto Aurelio Chavez-Arroyo4, Hugo Olivares-Espinosa1, Carlos Peralta5, Jamal Adib5, and Björn Witha6 Stefan Ivanell et al.
  • 1Uppsala University, Wind Energy Section, Campus Gotland, 621 67 Visby, Sweden
  • 2Barcelona Supercomputing Center, BSC, Spain
  • 3Wind Energy Department, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • 4National Renewable Energy Centre (CENER), Spain
  • 5Wobben Research and Development MS GmbH, Germany
  • 6ForWind – Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany

Abstract. This article describes a study where modellers were challenged to compute the wind at aforested site with moderately complex topography. The target was to match the measured windprofile at one exact location for three directions. The input to the modellers consisted of detailedinformation of forest densities and ground height derived from Airborne Laser Scans (ALS). Allparticipating models except two used the full detailed ground and forest information to modelthe forest which is considered a significant progress. The ALS based data resulted in reasonableagreement of the wind profile and turbulence magnitude. The best performance was found tobe that of LES using a very large domain. For the RANS type of models the constants in theturbulence closure was shown to be of great significance for the turbulence level, but of muchless importance for the wind speed profile. Overall, the article gives an overview of how welldifferent types of models are able to capture the flow physics at a moderate complex forestedsite.

Stefan Ivanell et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Stefan Ivanell et al.
Stefan Ivanell et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 389 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
260 124 5 389 13 6
  • HTML: 260
  • PDF: 124
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 389
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Apr 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 389 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 375 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 17 Oct 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This article describes a study where modellers were challenged to compute the wind at a forested site with moderately complex topography. The target was to match the measured wind profile at one exact location for three directions. The input to the modellers consisted of detailed information of forest densities and ground height. Overall, the article gives an overview of how well different types of models are able to capture the flow physics at a moderate complex forested site.
This article describes a study where modellers were challenged to compute the wind at a forested...
Citation
Share