Journal cover Journal topic
Wind Energy Science The interactive open-access journal of the European Academy of Wind Energy
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2016-52
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research articles
21 Dec 2016
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of this manuscript was accepted for the journal Wind Energy Science (WES) and is expected to appear here in due course.
Modern methods for investigating the stability of a pitching floating platform wind turbine
Matthew Lennie, David Marten, George Pechlivanoglou, Christian Navid Nayeri, and Christian Oliver Paschereit Chair of Fluid Dynamics– Hermann-Föttinger-Institut – Technische Universität Berlin Müller-Breslau-Str. 8, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Abstract. The QBlade implementation of the Lifting Line Free Vortex Wake method(LLFVW) was tested in conditions analogous to floating platform motion. Comparisons against two independent test cases, using a variety of simulation methods show excellent agreement in thrust forces, rotor power, blade forces and rotor plane induction. Along with the many verifications already undertaken in literature, it seems that the code performs solidly even in these challenging cases. Further to this, the key steps are presented from a new formulation of the instantaneous aerodynamic thrust damping of a wind turbine rotor. A test case with harmonic platform motion and collective pitch is used to demonstrate how combining such tools can lead to better understanding of aeroelastic stability.

Citation: Lennie, M., Marten, D., Pechlivanoglou, G., Nayeri, C. N., and Paschereit, C. O.: Modern methods for investigating the stability of a pitching floating platform wind turbine, Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2016-52, in review, 2016.
Matthew Lennie et al.
Interactive discussionStatus: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
RC1: 'Revisions', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Jan 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
 
RC2: 'referee comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
 
AC1: 'Response to Reviewers', Matthew Lennie, 05 Apr 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
Matthew Lennie et al.
Matthew Lennie et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
165 86 5 256 4 4

Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 256 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 18 Nov 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share